Federal Lawsuit Exposes Silicon Valley "Designer Child Trafficking" Enterprise. Names Law Enforcement and Judges Sinister Racketeering Scheme To Exploit Children For Huge Profits

A Federal Lawsuit filed in San Francisco claims San Mateo County and Santa Cruz County in Silicon Valley are the headquarters of a state run child trafficking operation that is supported, facilitated and protected by Judges, attorneys, police, "mental health" and other private contractors of the County. 

Click Read More To Read and Download the Federal Lawsuit

​Child abuse victims are not only vulnerable, but highly profitable.  The lawsuit states the enterprise engages in Racketeering to identify, target and exploit abuse victims for profit. Experts call this "Designer Child Trafficking" - abusive parents purchase custody of child victims and weaponize the system to silence and isolate children from their safe parent, orchestrated by a vast network of unscrupulous state actors.  

This is one case of many in California where safe parents are denied due process in a highly coordinated and sinister agenda to unlawfully deprive them of their Constitutionally Protected Parental Rights. California legislation seeks to expand and normalize the exploitation of children and transfer Parental Rights to the State in a flood of bills before the State legislature in a repugnant disregard for the Constitution of the United States of America.

Note: 9 in 10 California Judges are appointed by the Governor to keep "The Enterprise" in place and circumvent the public's right to elect Judges - public servants occupying what is intended to be an elected office. The appointed Judges, appear to be part of an elite ruling class that shows total disregard to their Oath of Office to uphold the Constitutional Rights of the people.

UPDATE: Parents are concerned the Democrat appointed Federal Judges in San Francisco may be in favor of the CA legislators attempts to create a policy of State ownership of children or may fear for their safety in exposing the highly profitable and powerful FAMILY COURT DEEP STATE SWAMP. ​

The case was approved to go forward by Judge Charles Bryer.  Judge Bryer, then promptly recused himself and was replaced by Judge Susan Illson.  On her own motion, Judge Illson reversed Bryers approval and has stalled the case from going forward.  The Plaintiff has asked Illson to recuse herself for abuse of Judicial discretion in vacating a more experienced previous ruling.  ​