 The Pink Punisher logo is an intentionally bold image that is meant to convey that MetooMoms will STAND UP to the extreme and severe VIOLENCE being committed against women and children by the very institutions that are charged with protecting them.
The Skull represents protection from evil. The American Flag represents the constitutional and legal rights that protect all citizens. The White Stripes represent the innocent women and children who are victims of domestic abuse, child abuse and sexual abuse. The White Stars represent the angels of the women and children murdered by their abuser or committed suicide to escape the abuse because the system refused to protect them. The Light Pink Stripes represent the victims who are afraid to speak up and remain silent. The One Hot Pink Stripe represents the brave mothers, fathers, advocates and whistleblowers taking a stand in the face of a corrupt, retaliatory and punitive system who relentlessly fight for justice no matter the cost. The Hot Pink Glitter represents the spark of hope that these brave souls will be safe, protected by God and victorious in their fight to restore justice. EXPOSE CORRUPTION. PROTECT CHILDREN. A recently uncovered report from 2013 reveals an interstate child trafficking and racketeering syndicate run through the Family Courts - a rich source of qualified leads for predatory "professionals" who view abused children as highly profitable. The enterprise uses the court to identify, target and exploit American children and parents who are easy prey through a complex scheme between state actors and private contractors and known pedophiles. The 2013 investigation is confirmed by our own investigation, 10 years later, which indicates this enterprise has significantly expanded. While the 2013 investigation focuses on sexually abused children and retaliation against their protective mothers, recent reports indicate fathers who attempt to protect their children from physically or sexually abusing mothers or step-fathers are equally retaliated against. Furthermore, the last several years have resulted in an explosion of fathers losing custody to mothers abusing children through gender mutilation procedures. Recent legislation in California, scripted by these same bad actors, seeks to expand the sinister state sponsored scheme to traffic American children to abusing parents or residential centers for gender mutilation facilitated by Courts, "mental health", medical providers, schools and social workers. All contact with the protective parent is unconstitutionally terminated as part of a documented playbook written by this enterprise, headquartered in Silicon Valley, with tentacles through the country in identified hot spots. This report focuses on the syndicate's historic roots in California and expansion to Connecticut. Click "Read More" to read and download the full report. Brief Excerpt: CONNECTICUT COURTS REPORT 4/16/2013 The Association of Family and Conciliation Courts - (AFCC) are Pedophile Advocates running Family Courts in CA and hotspots all over America. They have left no stone unturned, infiltrating every department and agency. Listed below are Pedophile Advocates who founded or sat on the board of the children's rights council, many with ties to AFCC and speak at AFCC conferences: Warren Farrell Published his "research" promoting incest and fathers raping their kids in Penthouse magazine. Farrell is also Fathers & Families main "go to" expert in custody cases on their website. Dr. Ralph Underwager and Holida Wakefield Promoted men raping little boys in Pedaika, the Dutch pedophile rag. They are also the founders of the False Memory Society, an organization dedicated to discrediting victims of violent crimes in court. Dr. John Money NAMBLAphile led experiments that involved giving elective sex change operations to baby boys to turn them into little girls. The subjects committed suicide. "If I were to see the case of a boy aged ten or eleven who's intensely erotically attracted toward a man in his twenties or thirties, if the relationship is totally mutual, and the bonding is genuinely totally mutual, then I would not call it pathological in any way." - John Money, Professor Emeritus of Medical Psychology, Johns Hopkins University, in an interview in Paidika: The Journal of Paedophilia, spring 1991 Sonny Burmeister (GA CRC founder), an alleged child molester and wife beater. James "Sinkiss" Smith I'm not sure what to say about these personal ads looking for a master/slave relationship. (link in article below) Dean Tong Accused child molester, arrested multiple times for beating his wive(s)--also frequent speaker at AFCC conferences, board member of fathers and families, ACFC, etc. Richard Gardner Frequent speaker at AFCC/CRC conferences advocates for pedophiles and phony psychological syndromes that discredit victims of sexual assault: "encounters between an adult and a child are not universally considered to be reprehensible acts. The child might be told about other societies in which such behavior was and is considered normal. The child might be helped to appreciate the wisdom of Shakespeare's Hamlet, who said, "Nothing's either good or bad, but thinking makes it so." Gardner, R.A. (1992). True and False Accusations of Child Sex Abuse . "In such discussions the child has to be helped to appreciate that we have in our society an exaggeratedly punitive and moralistic attitude about adult-child sexual encounters" Gardner, R.A. (1992). True and False Accusations of Child Sex Abuse . The purpose of recruiting so many pedophile sympathizers into the AFCC may have been to find professionals who were willing to deliberately manufacture litigation and inflate billing hours through AFCC court programs by placing children with dangerous criminals. Children in safe homes do not need to be assessed or treated for mental illness. AFCC Judges often order children into the care of violent offender fathers, then refuse to make decisions, drag cases out for years; involve multiple court appointed experts who cannot object to their appointment or opinions, leaving protective parents vulnerable to extortion, bankrupt and with only supervised visitation time with their children. AFCC members: Refuse to prosecute sex offenders for raping children, then deliberately awarding rapists and violent offenders sole custody child victims of sexual assault so that the mothers will fight to get the children back. (see Liberti v. Liberti) Ordering the non-offending mother to purchase her parenting time through crooked supervised visitation centers for the stated purpose of stopping the mother from reporting further abuse to medical or mental health providers. AFCC Offices And Members Prosecuted By Authorities Authorities raided the Los Angeles Superior Court, which also served at the headquarters for the CT Chapter of the AFCC, after Marvin Breyer sued the Court Administrator Gregory Pentoney. By 2001, Pentoney and several other LA county employees were convicted of fraud and incarcerated for kickback scheme run from their public offices. In 2011, Judge Patrick J. Mahoney, Presiding Judge of the San Francisco Unified Family Court came under criticism after the San Francisco Weekly reported on a string of cases where pedophile-friendly junk science promoted by AFCC members was used by pedophiles and violent criminals were awarded sole custody of victims. In one case, Mahoney awarded sole custody to a violent father at the recommendation of a custody evaluator who blogged about his fantasies drugging and raping animals. Click read more to read or download the entire report...spoiler alert - it gets worse! A Federal Lawsuit filed in San Francisco claims San Mateo County and Santa Cruz County in Silicon Valley are the headquarters of a state run child trafficking operation that is supported, facilitated and protected by Judges, attorneys, police, "mental health" and other private contractors of the County.
Child abuse victims are not only vulnerable, but highly profitable. The lawsuit states the enterprise engages in Racketeering to identify, target and exploit abuse victims for profit. Experts call this "Designer Child Trafficking" - abusive parents purchase custody of child victims and weaponize the system to silence and isolate children from their safe parent, orchestrated by a vast network of unscrupulous state actors. This is one case of many in California where safe parents are denied due process in a highly coordinated and sinister agenda to unlawfully deprive them of their Constitutionally Protected Parental Rights. California legislation seeks to expand and normalize the exploitation of children and transfer Parental Rights to the State in a flood of bills before the State legislature in a repugnant disregard for the Constitution of the United States of America. Note: 9 in 10 California Judges are appointed by the Governor to keep "The Enterprise" in place and circumvent the public's right to elect Judges - public servants occupying what is intended to be an elected office. The appointed Judges, appear to be part of an elite ruling class that shows total disregard to their Oath of Office to uphold the Constitutional Rights of the people. UPDATE: Parents are concerned the Democrat appointed Federal Judges in San Francisco may be in favor of the CA legislators attempts to create a policy of State ownership of children or may fear for their safety in exposing the highly profitable and powerful FAMILY COURT DEEP STATE SWAMP. Click read more to read and download the Federal Lawsuit The Santa Cruz County, California Board of Supervisors and City Council have refused to help the Mother of one of the three family court kidnapped children who were all violently kidnapped in the same neighborhood directly by the Santa Cruz Police Department or facilitated by the Santa Cruz Police Department. This Momma Bear has been showing up to meetings and making public comments. Her Instagram handle is @ForensicMomma and her youtube channel is also ForensicMomma. Capitol "M". She will be posting all her public comments to follow document the complicity of elected politicians in Santa Cruz, California who have not kept their word to dole out "serious consequences" to the 8 police officers who violently injured she and her daughter.
M-A-D National Spokeswoman Talks About The Epidemic Of Family Court Corruption And Her Own Personal Story Of Being Terrorized By San Mateo County Family Court In Silicon Valley. Click on the image to visit DeAnna Lorraine's Show "Shots Fired" On The Stew Peters Network or click here INTERVIEW STARTS AT 31 minutes.
Judges Use Police As Their Personal Gestapo To Violently Assault Children To Enforce Unconstitutional Orders. Video Exposes Epidemic Of Corruption - Court Ordered Trafficking of Kids For Profit. This is not an isolated incident (see article below on another Santa Cruz teen violently court-kidnapped by police). This is happening EVERYDAY in California and all over America. CLICK READ MORE FOR FULL STORY
 The corruption in San Mateo County Family Court is so out of control, harming countless children for decades with total impunity and zero accountability, that we receive more reports from Silicon Valley than anywhere in the world. Parents, insider whistleblowers, former court connected professionals and even children who are now adult survivors victims of the Silicon Valley Family Court Cabal have organized and are demanding "NO MORE". The MomsandDads movement of San Mateo is an unstoppable movement supported by concerned parents and citizens who see the desperate need for reform. CLICK READ MORE FOR FULL STORY
For a year and a half, Franchetti had been trying to warn a Long Island court that Rumsey was unstable and violent and should not be allowed unsupervised time with their daughter. But the judge granted him time alone with Kyra while they awaited the custody trial. Had her concerns been taken more seriously, Franchetti believes her daughter would be alive today.
Jacqueline Franchetti with her daughter Kyra in 2016.Jacqueline Franchetti"I did everything I was supposed to do. I left the abusive relationship. I came forward with as much as I possibly could," she said. "Kyra's murder was 100 percent preventable." READ MORE... Sunday, October 18, 2020
by Tesha M. Christensen Monitor, Saint Paul Voices Against Violence Series Because fit mothers are losing custody and children are being harmed, supporters of Safe Child Act want to make sure family court focuses on child safety over parents rights...Of the moms she knows who lost legal custody and got reduced parenting time, none had criminal convictions or had been in criminal court. There was no determination of negligence or endangerment. “They hardly had a speeding ticket,” said Roy. “People just assume lawmakers and judges are looking out for children – and they’re not. “The public needs to get informed.” Evidence ignored as ’heresay’ What is the contributing factor to women losing custody? Not being heard on the evidence they have, according to Roy. She pointed to cases like that of her friend, Leigh Ann Olson Block, whose evidence of domestic violence was ignored by the Ramsey County Family Court. Having been given joint legal custody and over 50% of the parenting time, Highland High School graduate John Tester murdered their daughter Mikayla the weekend before she would have started kindergarten in September 2004. This isn’t an isolated case. Since 2008, the Center for Judicial Excellence has identified 748 children who were murdered by a divorcing or separating parent. READ MORE... ‘It takes two’ is a myth. There is the idea in family court that there are two equal parties in a divorce. “The mantra is that it takes two,” observed Richards, and that both parties are engaged in conflict. These are then termed “high conflict” cases.
That doesn’t factor in the reality of domestic violence. Where there’s intimate partner violence, one person is exerting power and control over the other and is engaged in manipulating the system. “If you have a father who has been engaged in coercive control, they’re highly skilled in using these same tactics in the family court system,” said Richards. “The general presumption is that moms get custody in divorce cases,” observed Richards. While that may be true when you look at all of divorce cases, those where couples can agree on what to do about their kids, it isn’t true when domestic violence is a factor. “If you look at the contested cases with domestic violence against the mother or child abuse by the father against the child, fathers are more likely to gain custody,” said Richards.The study looked at more than 2,000 custody cases involving child abuse, domestic violence, and parental alienation nationwide. There is no study specific to Minnesota and no state agency that looks specifically at domestic violence, but Richards believes that Minnesota mirrors what has been found at a national level. “When there are contested cases and domestic violence, fathers are receiving custody more frequently,” stated Richards. READ MORE... by Naomi Cahn, Senior Contributor
Forbes.com Emma (name and identifying details changed) was married to a man in the military for many years. During that time, he repeatedly abused her and their children. She reported the abuse to the police and to the military. When she went to court, she had recordings of her husband’s threats against her. But a court decided to award custody of their children to the father. Why? The father claimed parental alienation, that Emma was alienating the children from their father by false claims that he was abusing them. The term “parental alienation” comes from the work of child psychiatrist Richard Gardner in the 1980s to explain what he saw as a shocking number of child sexual abuse allegations in custody litigation. Gardner claimed that many of these abuse allegations were fabricated by vengeful or pathological mothers. But his theory has been subjected to strong criticism, such as that from Jeffrey Edleson, former director of the Minnesota Center Against Violence and Abuse and professor and director of research at the University of Minnesota School of Social Work, who said in 2009 that, “PAS is essentially composed of unsubstantiated claims; there’s no science behind it.” Nonetheless, it survives in a gender-neutral form as parental alienation. But, that too has been discredited, and as the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges, explains, it “also diverts attention away from the behaviors of the abusive parent.” READ MORE... By Samantha Schmidt
Washington Post July 29, 2019 Hera McLeod pleaded with the family court judge to keep her 15-month-old son, Prince, away from her abusive ex-boyfriend. The mother, along with many other witnesses, told the court about the man’s fits of rage, the night he threatened to kill her at gunpoint, the times he allegedly abused his older son and allegedly raped McLeod’s sister. But the judge said there was insufficient evidence of the alleged abuse by the father, Joaquin Rams. “There’s a lot of smoke,” said the family court judge in Montgomery County, Md. “With all that smoke, I can’t see clearly.” The court initially ordered supervised visits with the baby’s father, but just months later allowed Rams to keep Prince for unsupervised, all-day visits. Then on the fourth visit, on Oct. 20, 2012, Rams drowned the toddler at a friend’s home in Manassas, Va. He was found guilty of capital murder in 2017. READ MORE by Laurie Udesky (an award-winning investigative reporter) 100Reporters
EXCERPT: In family courts throughout the country, evidence that one of the parents is sexually or physically abusing a child is routinely rejected. Instead, perpetrators of abuse are often entrusted with unsupervised visits or joint or sole custody of the children they abuse, putting children in danger of serious, often life-threatening harm, according to children’s advocates. Our two-year investigation – which includes interviews with more than 30 parents and survivors in California, Ohio, North Carolina, New York, Georgia, Texas, Tennessee, Maryland and New Jersey – uncovered stories of children consigned to suffer years of abuse in fear and silence while the parents who sought to protect them were driven to the brink financially and psychologically. These parents have become increasingly stigmatized by a family court system that not only discounts evidence of abuse but accepts dubious theories used to undermine the protective parents’ credibility. READ MORE... |
